You will always get what you want

ABOUT

Zhao Yue David
18
08/03/1992
PEPS,RPS,RI,RJC:)
RIMB'08,RJCSB'10, Trombonist'forever
RWINDS:)))
davidzhaoyue2003@hotmail.com

LOVES

Family&Friends :D
RJCSB'09 and '10
10SO3J
Music
People who care
Man Utd :)))))


HATES

Hypocrites



WISHLIST

Be happy
World Peace
Atempo XX all over again
Good A lvl results
FRIENDS
friend #1
friend #2
friend #3
friend #4
friend #5
friend #6



ARCHIVES

# November 2006
# February 2007
# March 2007
# April 2007
# August 2007
# November 2007
# February 2008
# April 2008
# May 2008
# June 2008
# July 2008
# August 2008
# October 2008
# November 2008
# December 2008
# January 2009
# February 2009
# April 2009
# May 2009
# June 2009
# September 2009
# October 2009
# November 2009
# December 2009
# January 2010
# May 2010
# June 2010
# July 2010
# September 2010
# October 2010
# November 2010



CREDITS

# designer
# photobucket
# blogskins
# blogger


SHOUTOUTS



Thursday, August 30, 2007
English Blog assignment

A case of too little, too late?

As the vice-premier of The People’s Republic of China declared a 4-month war on its home-grown products in a bid to improve the quality of the goods and to clean up China’s tarnished image on the economic front, I personally feel that this may be a case of too little, too late, or a struggle between two super-powers, the has-been and the will-be.
All across the globe, as China’s home-made products have flown far and wide from Asia, there had been constant reports questioning the quality of the goods that China has produced. There were reports from New Zealand about the so-called fire-safety clothing that China has made. Around the globe, parents were paranoid when reports came out that the Mattel toys that were made by China contained large amounts of lead. In China itself, there was a bogey report about the charsiew paos containing cardboard and meat, so as to save costs. Even though that was a fake report, it just goes to show that since news can be faked, fake food products can also exist. Since then, there has been a continuous stream of reports coming out from all corners of the globe complaining about the bad quality of the products made from China. These products range from toothpastes to beauty products to medicine and so on. Recently, the execution of a former drugs minister in China, who was convicted of being corrupt, further fuelled the belief that China’s products are not as good as the other countries in terms of quality. The case of the corrupt minister also goes to show that China officials are willing to close both eyes on a certain company’s products, be it good or bad, as long as they were paid a substantiate amount of money. This scenario is bad for the image of the manufacturing industries in China as bad products will tend to bypass the security checks and thus, the bad sheep among the herd is not picked out and affects everyone. Also, as most of China’s manufacturing industries are small companies, they are usually unregulated by officials from the government and hence, they are able to go straight into the market without any official checks. Thus, it is hard to fish out those companies that have produced those second-rate goods as they are simply too many of them to pin-point out anyone. Thus, I feel that even the best efforts of the Chinese government, providing that they are able to offer their officials a better option than to go down the path of corruption, may not be able to fish out all the bad products as China is too big, but it may be worth the effort to serve as a warning to the others.
Another point to note may be the biased view towards Chinese products. While I have to admit that these reports should be true, I would also have to point out that there is this misconception that Chinese products are not up to mark just because Chinese labour is cheap. Cheap is by no means lacking in quality. Labour is China is cheap just because the population in China is overwhelming and too many people are vying for that spot in the factories, thus salaries have to be reduced. If we are talking about cheap labour is paramount to bad quality, then what about Vietnam and Cambodia? Their labour is cheaper, if not as cheap. Yet, nobody questions the Nike shoes or the Adidas shoes that they have made. Hence, this could be an indirect battle between the US and the PRC on the economic front. The US may have been trying to slow down the economic progress of the PRC by exaggerating on some isolated cases of poor products and thus, affecting the output profit that the Chinese gain, thus affecting the economic growth of China. Though this may be one of my points of view, it is perhaps a little startling to find that most of the reports, if not all, came from the US, and its allies, in Oceania and in the EU.
All in all, this episode has not been a pleasant one to the Chinese. As they host the Olympics next year, they must tidy up their image as quickly as possible. There is no doubt that China has faced a lot of controversies in the past few years and is not far behind the US in number of controversies faced. The Taiwan issue has not been solved and then there is this worry about the safety of their products. If the Chinese do not solve these two problems soon, even a fantastic Olympics show by the Chinese may not be able to repair their tarnished image and this will result in them losing out eventually to rising powers like India.

David said 7:52 PM<3

DISCLAIMER!!
HEY,I DON'T HATE SCHOOL KAYS..LOLL..but i just like the look of this blogskin:)